After a long wait, it’s finally here: the Dobber Prospects Draft Team’s Final Ranking for the 2025 NHL Draft.

While in previous updates we’ve kept our rankings slimmer, this time around, we went through the long process of fleshing out our entire top 96. While a lot has been made about the strength of this draft crop, all our scouts still have players that we’re passionate about throughout our entire ranking.

Our top four remain unchanged, but every pick after came with intense deliberation. As a result, we’ve reached a ranking that we feel is a balanced one.

Brady Martin—who received plenty of attention at the scouting combine—was one of our biggest risers, as was Minnesota High School star Mason West, who made his first appearance in our first round.

On the other hand, Jackson Smith and Cameron Schmidt had two of our most notable ranking slides. While they’re the two names that jump off the page, our rankings saw a ton of movement, especially outside the first round.

If you like what you read, don’t forget to follow some of the members of our team:

Luke Sweeney—Director of North American Scouting(@SweeneyLuke17)

Jordan Harris—Director of European Scouting(@jordan_NHLDraft)

Anni Karvinen—Finnish Regional Scout & USA Crossover(@ScoutWithAnni)

Kareem Ramadan—Russian Regional Scout & USA Crossover(@hockeytakes15)

Ethan Lindley—Swedish Regional Scout (@gtcj10)

Seth Ditchfield—Central Europe Regional Scout(@Seth_Scouting)

David Saad—OHL Regional Scout (@SaadScouting)

Collin Wilcox—WHL Regional Scout (@bombs_clap)

Éloi Biondo—QMJHL Regional Scout (@eloi632211)

Whittaker Heart—North American Crossover Scout (@whittakerheart)

Austin Kelly—General Crossover (@AustinReporting)

****

1.         Matthew Schaefer, D (6-2, 183 lbs)—Erie Otters (OHL) Upside: 9.5 Certainty: 8.0

It’s been a long time since a defenceman has been as unilaterally praised as Matthew Schaefer. An elite skater, Schaefer has proven to be an explosive, agile and fluid player in all directions allowing him to control the pace of play and jump into offensive rushes with ease. Schaefer pairs this with top-tier offensive instincts, excelling in breakouts where his continuous application of deception and speed makes him a challenge for any defender to stop. Once he lands in the offensive zone, Schaefer’s skill as a triple-threat with his shot, passing, and handling ability allow him to generate chances with outstanding regularity. His passing is particularly advanced, integrating seamlessly with his puck skills to create consistent high-danger scoring chances. Defensively, he’s aggressive and anticipates plays well, closing gaps effectively with his stick and positioning. Although some physical development may be needed, Schaefer’s natural talent, elite skill-set and high-end tools make him a clear favorite for the first overall pick. In a draft light on high-end defencemen, Schaefer’s skillset and profile give him a significant edge, even with the relatively small sample size.—David Saad

2.         Michael Misa, C (6-1, 183 lbs)—Saginaw Spirit (OHL)       Upside: 9.5 Certainty: 9.0

Though he’s not our number one prospect, the gulf between Misa and third is much wider than that between him and Schaefer. In terms of skating, handling, and shooting, Misa has all the tools that you’d look for in an NHL centre. His unreal production in the OHL (1st in the CHL in points, 2nd in goals) should make him a no-doubt, can’t-miss pick. Throw in elite vision and processing, a dedication to a two-way game, net-driving tendencies, and the ability to play within a system, and Misa is as close to perfect as you can get.

There are differing opinions as to whether or not Misa will truly become an NHL 1C. While I don’t see Mackinnon-Barkov territory, he’s also a clear step ahead of other recent 1OA picks like Lafreniere, Slafkosvky, or even Hischier. A solid 1C with all-situations utility is in the near future.—Luke Sweeney

3.         James Hagens, C (5-11, 185 lbs)—Boston College (NCAA)            Upside: 9.0 Certainty: 5.0

James Hagens’ season at Boston College left many scouts underwhelmed, and for understandable reasons. Scoring at a point-per-game rate as a college freshman is impressive, but not extraordinary. For a player entering his draft season viewed almost unanimously as the consensus first overall pick, his game left a lot to be desired, especially when compared to the dominant draft-year performances of Adam Fantilli and Macklin Celebrini.

However, the foundation of the player remains intact and shouldn’t be overlooked. His skill level is undeniable even to the skeptics, and when combined with his speed and shiftiness, it forms a toolkit that can translate to the next level.

Hagens is a player—like many in this draft class—who drew differing opinions from our scouts. Some on our team are concerned about his play-driving ability, and that’s a fair critique: he struggled in that area, particularly against tight-checking teams. Still, he remains our third-ranked player. The combination of skill and speed—and the potential for added layers with increased strength—makes him impossible to overlook. Whether he becomes a play-driving top-line center or a playmaking second-line winger remains to be seen.—Anni Karvinen

4.         Porter Martone, W (6-3, 205 lbs)—Brampton Steelheads (OHL) Upside: 9.0 Certainty: 6.0

In the first half of the season, Martone looked like he could challenge for the first overall pick. The 6’3 winger was producing at over a 2PPG pace while looking like a dominant offensive catalyst. After a quiet World Juniors, Martone seemed to fade a bit while appearing less confident, losing his chance at contending for a top pick. An average skater who can lose out in chases hasn’t helped his case. Despite having a power forward build, Martone hasn’t emerged as such beyond having the frame to one day do it. Some moments of flash and intensity seem to indicate there’s more Martone can do that he’s still unlocking, he may need a bit more time to get to his peak, much like Tom Wilson as a youngster who took a few years in the NHL to get to where he is now. A good Worlds seems to have renewed his confidence and optimism that he’ll be able to bounce back next season. First line potential, especially if the physicality comes.—Austin Kelly

5.         Caleb Desnoyers, C (6-2, 172 lbs)—Moncton Wildcats (QMJHL) Upside: 8.5 Certainty: 8.0

Desnoyers had an outstanding conclusion to his draft year, winning the Guy Lafleur Trophy for QMJHL playoff MVP after leading the Wildcats to their third title in franchise history. While imposing himself on the scoresheet (31 points in 19 games) Caleb’s play shone constantly in all three zones. His hockey IQ and compete level allow him to make subtle but highly important plays that contribute to his team’s success and make his teammates around him better. On top of his well-rounded game, Caleb possesses superior puck skills and vision which allows him to buy time and space for himself and spot teammates in high-danger scoring positions. His ability to consistently be the main play driver on an experienced Moncton Wildcats team, combined with his pedigree as a complete centerman, suggests that he should go very high in this year’s 2025 NHL Draft.—Eloi Biondo

6.         Anton Frondell, C (6-1, 205 lbs)—Djurgardens IF (Allsvenskan) Upside: 8.5  Certainty: 8.0

Measuring 6-1 and 204lbs at the draft combine, Frondell is a tank on skates. He doesn’t so much outmuscle pro-level opponents, but rather eliminates them from the play entirely with his physicality. Frondell’s strength and crafty ability to protect the puck allows him the time to be patient and make effective decisions. It’s especially impressive how he finds soft areas to slide into and how he times his movements precisely in order to activate his lethal release. The shot itself explodes from his blade and is heavy enough to beat professional goaltenders from distance. Frondell handles the puck well, especially in tight areas around the net. He flashes moments of very dynamic handling, deceptive maneuvers, as well as intelligent play creation at times, but there could be more consistency in that area of his game. The compete and awareness allow him to disrupt play defensively. Frondell certainly has the tools to be at the very least a responsible middle six center, but if his combination of power and finesse continue to develop, he could evolve into a team’s leading goal scorer with a strong physical game to compliment his skill.—Ethan Lindley

7.         Jake O’Brien, C (6-2, 170 lbs)—Brantford Bulldogs (OHL)             Upside: 8.5 Certainty: 7.0

O’Brien is a high-end playmaker with exceptional vision who sees plays like some of the NHL’s best, featuring both high creativity when moving the puck and impeccable timing on his passes. His defensive game is solid, with good positioning and active stick. O’Brien also tried his hand as more of a goalscorer early on in the season to mixed results.  This impacted his early season assist totals, though O’Brien’s 66 assists were good for sixth in the league. O’Brien played alongside OHL leading scorer Nick Lardis in Brantford, but largely played on the second line alongside a different Blackhawks prospect in Marek Vanacker. He might lean on his playmaking a bit much, but it’s a legitimate standout tool.—Austin Kelly

8.         Victor Eklund, W (5-11, 170 lbs)—Djurgardens IF (Allsvenskan)    Upside: 8.5 Certainty: 7.5

Victor Eklund is your stereotypical “does whatever it takes to win” player. Despite his lack of stature, his physicality and his ability to handle opponents’ physicality is arguably his best asset. Combine those two qualities with passion and explosiveness and you’ve got a player that every coach would love to have in their lineup. Eklund doesn’t resist pressure, he pushes through it, powering along the boards before driving inside for a scoring opportunity. His playmaking ability shines from behind the net where he regularly slips passes through pressure to the crease and low slot. He creates space to pull off these plays by leveraging his smaller frame to shield defenders from the puck. Eklund also boasts a shot that deceives goaltenders by how quickly he releases it. He’s shifty and evasive which allows him to carry pucks in transition and be extremely effective on the rush, as well as hard to contain in tight spaces. Eklund’s pace of play and intensity builds the foundation of a strong energy winger, but it’s his intelligence, creativity, and skill that may allow him to develop into a complimentary top six scorer with an edge. The beast is only going to get stronger.—Ethan Lindley

9.         Lynden Lakovic, W (6-4, 190 lbs)—Moose Jaw Warriors (WHL)    Upside: 9.0 Certainty: 5.0

Questions about his intensity/physicality have chased him all season long, but Lakovic’s skillset is tremendous. At his size, there are maybe two other players in this draft who can skate and handle the puck at his level. His playmaking vision and ability—especially off the rush, at speed—elevated his teammates all season. Though he needs to tune his accuracy, Lakovic’s shooting mechanics are excellent as well. Lakovic also had to drive the bus on a depleted Moose Jaw squad, leading them with over a point-per-game and factoring in on over half the team’s goals. Though I think the checking concerns are over-blown, even as-is Lakovic could be a force in the NHL.—Luke Sweeney

10.       Carter Bear, W/C (6-0, 179 lbs)—Everett Silvertips (WHL)           Upside: 8.0 Certainty: 8.5

If it weren’t for the injury, Bear could very well have ended up much higher than this: he has the intangible tools that every NHL team covets. He’s a relentless hard-worker, a constant pace-pusher, and plays a detailed game. He’s shown he can play an intentional, straight-lines checking game in addition to a more skilled, dynamic one. He’s played centre or the wing, either complementarily or as the main driver. He was one of the WHL’s highest scorers on one of its best teams—even if that was hampered later in the season by Everett’s injury issues and, therefore, greater defensive responsibility for Bear. In a draft whose top-end talent falls off abruptly, Bear offers a surefire top-six bet, so long as his recovery goes according to plan.—Luke Sweeney

11.       Brady Martin, C (6-0, 187 lbs)—Soo Greyhounds (OHL)    Upside: 8.0  Certainty: 8.5

Brady Martin is a dynamic, hard-nosed center in the mold of Sam Bennett, combining relentless energy with rare physicality for his age. His game is defined by an unmatched motor, devastating body checks, and a forecheck that overwhelms opponents. However, he’s far more than just a physical presence: he’s a legitimate dual-threat offensively. Martin can beat goalies from mid-range, battles fiercely in high-traffic areas, and is even better as a playmaker, disguising passes by manipulating defenders with his eyes or faking a shot before delivering a crisp tape-to-tape feed. While his skating was initially a concern, his stride improved throughout the season, and his agility at top speed is now a strength. Further refining his crossovers and lower-body strength will unlock another level. The most exciting part about Martin’s game is that it got better and better as the season wore on. Martin finished the season with 41 points in his final 27 games and finished as Canada’s second-leading scorer at the U18s, capped by a two-goal gold-medal performance. His blend of physicality, offensive polish, and clutch play makes him one of the most exciting and projectable centers in this draft class.—Kareem Ramadan

12.       Radim Mrtka, D (6-6, 218 lbs)—Seattle Thunderbirds (WHL) Upside: 8.5 Certainty: 6.5

Going from playing pro hockey in Czechia to the WHL managed to help Mrtka’s stock as he showed his game does it’s best when he’s given more ice time. A big 6-6 defenseman with strong skating and creativity in transition, Mrtka’s been an effective playmaker and shutdown defender who can play with a physical edge. Mrtka still has some ways to go in his hockey sense and maturity, needing to tidy up his game in order to be a top-four defenseman, though its not unrealistic to think he can hit that upside.—Austin Kelly

13.       Roger McQueen, C (6-5, 192 lbs)—Brandon Wheat Kings (WHL) Upside: 9.0  Certainty: 4.0

Though McQueen’s ranking remains contentious, his projection is far less divisive than it was at the beginning of the year. At this point, he’s an upside swing with a weighty list of pros and cons.

He’s among the draft’s best, most accurate shooters and has high-end handling skill around the net and in tight to his body. Plus, he’s 6-5 and plays with physical willingness. Nevertheless, between his off-puck game, his injury, and his penchant for drubbing bad teams, the takeaway is clear:

It’s not just the injury with McQueen: even if fully healthy, he’s a player that comes with significant risk but tantalizing upside.—Luke Sweeney

14.       Cullen Potter, C (5-10, 172 lbs)—Arizona State (NCAA)     Upside: 9.0  Certainty: 4.0

We’re very comfortable being the outlet that consistently has Potter the highest; his skillset is too dynamic to ignore.

Potter’s decision-making/IQ is often cited as a sticking point. I see the concerns. He does often force plays that aren’t there, though I think you could say similar things for McQueen, O’Brien, and Carbonneau, all players who are frequently ranked higher and play against lighter competition. I think that’s some of the natural give-and-take with highly skilled, creative players, which Potter certainly is.

He’s possibly the draft’s best skater thanks to his top-end footspeed, explosiveness, agility, and fluid acceleration. He’s a creative puck-carrier, an elite chance-generator with a powerful shot, and has shown flashes of very strong playmaking ability. I’ve heard criticism about Potter’s work-rate, and while I don’t think he projects as an energy-guy, I don’t get the concerns: he tracks back hard through the middle of the ice, forechecks and finishes his checks, and works hard to make up for his errors.

He’s small, and there are inconsistencies in his game, but if you focus too much on these, you’ll miss one of this draft’s most exciting players.—Luke Sweeney

15.       Braeden Cootes, C (6-0, 183 lbs)—Seattle Thunderbirds (WHL)     Upside: 8.0  Certainty: 7.5

An impact player in all three zones, Cootes is relentless with and without the puck. He is aggressive and physical in puck battles, generating a ton of turnovers and always looking to get out in transition. A coach’s dream, and he’ll likely be available in the teens. Sign me up.—Collin Wilcox

16.       Logan Hensler, D (6-2, 196 lbs)—University of Wisconsin (OHL) Upside: 7.5 Certainty: 7.5

Logan Hensler has been a hard one to figure out. With his great skating and NHL-level tools, it’s fairly easy to project him to play in the NHL at some capacity. Based on the flashes of offensive upside, we believe that with continued development, he could grow into a puck-moving second-pair defenseman.—Anni Karvinen

17.       Jackson Smith, D (6-3, 190 lbs)—Tri-City Americans (WHL) Upside: 9.0  Certainty: 5.0

Jackson Smith has all the physical tools needed to thrive as an NHL defenseman. He isn’t afraid to lay the body, and his explosive skating enables him to be a suffocating rush defender and dynamic transition player. With a little refinement and some improved processing, the sky’s the limit.—Collin Wilcox

18.       Ben Kindel, W/C (5-10, 181 lbs)—Calgary Hitmen (WHL)          Upside: 8.5 Certainty: 5.5

Kindel’s a player who I liked last year and loved this season. I was probably fair to question a sub-6-foot player without high-end tools, but I’ve come around to seeing Kindel as a potential top-sixer.

Though one of the highest-scoring WHLers, Kindel doesn’t project as a big point-getter, but his innate awareness and understanding of the game help him consistently move play in the right direction. He supports transition through all three zones, extends OZ sequences through wall-play and heady passing, and seems to always get to his spots, right on-time.

Kindel projects as a second-line winger who can play in all-situations and elevate the play of whoever he lines up next to.—Luke Sweeney

19.       Bill Zonnon, C/W (6-2, 190 lbs)—Rouyn-Noranda Huskies (QMJHL) Upside: 7.5 Certainty: 8.0

Bill Zonnon brings a lovable and projectable approach to the game that NHL teams might appreciate. The 6-2 centre from the Q is fast, intense, and has some untapped playmaking potential. The skating is a work in progress, but he’ll crack an NHL bottom 6. Traded to Blainville-Boisbriand Armada this summer.—Whittaker Heart

20.       Cameron Reid, D (6-0, 174 lbs)—Kitchener Rangers (OHL) Upside: 8.5 Certainty: 5.5

Cameron Reid is a highly skilled, smooth-skating defenceman known for his mobility, hockey IQ, and strong passing ability. Reid is extraordinarily efficient offensively, maintaining a calm, collected approach and picking his battles tactfully before using his skating to unlock offensive options. To succeed in the NHL, Reid must get more aggressive and boost his physical resilience.—David Saad

21.       Cole Reschny, C (5-10, 187 lbs)—Victoria Royals (WHL)   Upside: 8.0 Certainty: 6.5

Cole Reschny ended his draft year in roaring fashion, dominating both the WHL playoffs with Victoria and the U18s with Team Canada. The centre makes up for his lack of size with scoring instincts and intensity in his approach. He’ll be at NCAA North Dakota in the fall, a great move for his development.—Whittaker Heart

22.       Justin Carbonneau, W (6-1, 192 lbs)—Blainville-Broisbriand Armada (QMJHL)               Upside: 9.0  Certainty: 4.5

Justin Carbonneau was one of the more exciting players to watch, combining some of the best hands in the draft with goal scoring and physicality. He has a great frame and had the ability to take over games this year. Carbonneau will need maturation in his approach, find a role, and playing more completely.—Whittaker Heart

23.       Eric Nilson, C (6-0, 165 lbs)—Djurgardens IF (J20)                         Upside: 7.5 Certainty: 5.5

Eric Nilson is a quick and shifty center who engages physically and plays an intense style of hockey. He’s fairly underdeveloped physically so there is potential for massive improvement strength wise. He hunts for pucks and relentlessly pursues his opponents until he has possession. Eric Nilson also displays moments of high-end vision and creativity, indicating that there could be middle six center upside.—Ethan Lindley

24.       Vaclav Nestrasil, C (6-6, 185 lbs)—Muskegon Lumberjacks (OHL) Upside: 7.5 Certainty: 5.5

Nestrasil took major leaps throughout the regular season, constantly improving his consistency from start to end. The 6-5 winger has a high compete level and has been able to effectively use his size and motor to take over at both ends of the ice. A raw prospect who may need a few years to hit his potential.—Austin Kelly

25.       Shane Vansaghi, W (6-2, 216 lbs)—Michigan State (NCAA)           Upside: 6.5 Certainty: 7.5

We’re confident Shane Vansaghi will play in the NHL in some role. With punishing hits and relentless work ethic, he’s the epitome of an effective forechecker. Occasional flashes of puck skill suggest there might even be upside for a middle-six winger role.—Anni Karvinen

26.       Malcolm Spence, C (6-2, 201 lbs)—Erie Otters (OHL)        Upside: 6.5 Certainty: 8.0

Malcolm Spence has clear tools—physicality, a strong shot, and two-way upside—but an underwhelming draft year raised concerns. Once seen as a high-motor competitor, his off-puck disengagement and lack of offensive evolution are the main worries. There’s still potential for a middle-six forward, but Spence needs to get back to what made him so highly coveted in the first place.—David Saad

27.       Alexander Zharovsky, C (6-1, 163 lbs)—Tolpar Ufa (MHL)            Upside: 7.5 Certainty: 5.5

The 17-year-old Alexander Zharovsky has solidified himself as one of the draft’s most intriguing prospects, thanks to a strong season in the MHL that culminated in a KHL playoff promotion. While he managed just one point in limited minutes, the mere fact that he was trusted to play against men in the playoffs (and without looking out of place) speaks volumes about his maturity and upside.

Zharovsky is a magician in tight spaces, blending dynamic puck handling ability with high end playmaking vision to generate offense. Though his skating lacks an explosive first step, his edgework and top-speed separation are better than he is given credit for. While he occasionally overhandles the puck, his handling and offensive instincts offers the type of projectable, high-end talent rarely found outside the first round. For teams picking in the 40-60 range, Zharovsky represents a home-run swing on a player whose ceiling outweighs many of his peers.—Kareem Ramadan

28.       Mason West, C/W (6-7, 218 lbs)—Fargo Force (USHL)       Upside: 8.5 Certainty: 3.0

Mason West is a last-minute riser that just cracked our 1st round. The hulking 6-7 forward will finish his HS football career at Edina before switching full time to hockey. West is incredibly raw and will require refinement in many areas, but it’s hard not to see a bottom 6 winger here.—Whittaker Heart

29.       Carter Amico, D (6-6, 234 lbs)—USNTDP (USHL)             Upside: 6.0  Certainty: 7.5

Though he had a shortened season, Amico checks a lot of boxes as a potential NHLer. He’s huge and filled out, as well as bringing a sought-after combination of physicality, defensive awareness, athleticism, and quickness on his skates (even if that area still has some edges to be buffed out). A potential minute-muncher.—Luke Sweeney

30.       Blake Fiddler, D (6-4, 209 lbs)—Edmonton Oil Kings (WHL) Upside: 7.5 Certainty: 6.0

Fiddler is an intriguing though inconsistent defenceman. He has high-end skating at his size and a developed rush defence game for his age, though his offensive game is still a work in progress. His decision making and vision with the puck can be questionable, especially when he tries to do more than he’s asked. All-in-all, the package that he brings is worth a shot, even if the offence never develops.—Luke Sweeney

31.       Kashawn Aitcheson, D (6-1, 198 lbs)—Barrie Colts (OHL) Upside: 8.0 Certainty: 4.0

Though this is far below where he will inevitably go on Draft Day, this is closer to the higher-end of the range that the Dobber Prospects Draft Team feels comfortable taking Aitcheson. The question isn’t what he’s done in the OHL this season (which is obviously appealing), but how this will translate.

He’s a physically punishing enforcer, but at 6-1, his size is only average among NHLers (not to mention that he’s among the draft’s oldest, most physically mature players). He scored over 20 goals as a defenceman, but so many of them come from abandoning his post and driving the net, leaving you to question his scoring upside in a more structured environment. 

Overall, his tools are solid, though his implementation will need to drastically change to avoid driving NHL coaches crazy.—Luke Sweeney

32.       Ryker Lee, C/W (6-0, 181 lbs)— (USHL) Madison Capitals            Upside: 8.0 Certainty: 5.5

Ryker Lee is one of the most tantalizing yet perplexing prospects in the USHL. He boasts elite puck-handling ability, exceptional vision, and a quick release that makes him a constant offensive threat; on his best nights, he’s the most skilled player on the ice.

However, his inconsistency stems from well-below-average skating. With poor straight-line speed, balance, and edgework, this hinders Lee’s defensive engagement, forechecking effectiveness, and overall shift-to-shift impact. However, the root of his skating issues may lie in a recent growth spurt that disrupted his mechanics, and it is also worth mentioning that Lee finished in first at the combine in the vertical jump. This is significant because the vertical jump is widely regarded as an excellent measure of an athlete’s lower-body power, which directly correlates with their potential to generate explosive speed—two things critical to building speed.

If you buy into the notion that Lee’s skating is correctable, he has the kind of high end skill, creativity, and raw athletic tools to develop into a top 6 forward at the next level, but his ceiling hinges entirely on addressing this critical flaw.—Kareem Ramadan

33.       Jack Nesbitt, C (6-4, 183 lbs)—Windsor Spitfires (OHL)     Upside: 6.5 Certainty: 6.0

Jack Nesbitt has fallen under the radar while playing down the lineup on a very strong Windsor team. Despite this, Nesbitt produced near a point per game in the regular season. Defensively, he’s detail-oriented, with an active stick, good positioning, and a commitment to tracking through the middle. Offensively, he shows a feel for playmaking with good patience and vision. The fluidity in his handling ability is still an area he needs to improve. Coaches will love his compete level, opponents will dread his consistency. A complete, work-horse type forward with undeniable upside.—Kareem Ramadan

34.       Hayden Paupanekis, C (6-5, 203 lbs)—Kelowna Rockets (WHL) Upside: 7.0 Certainty: 6.0

An imposing, two-way center with the ability to play as a true power-forward, Hayden Paupanekis is also an extremely fluid skater for his size. Questions remain regarding long-term offensive upside, but he plays with his head up in possession, and he’s shown flashes of high-end finishing talent.—Collin Wilcox

35.       Cole McKinney, C (6-0, 201 lbs)—USNTDP (USHL)                      Upside: 6.0 Certainty: 7.5

Arguably the most consistent member of the NTDP this season, McKinney is a 200ft center with good maturity and hockey sense. He’s a reliable player with a mature game who could be a middle-six NHLer if he can add more speed to his skating. A skillset tailored for pro hockey.—Austin Kelly

36.       Jack Murtagh, W (6-1, 198 lbs)—USNTDP (USHL)                        Upside: 7.5 Certainty: 6.0

His ceiling might not blow anyone away, but thanks to Murtagh’s tools—namely his swift release and his powerful stride—and his workmanlike approach, he should have a strong NHL career and could work his way into the first round. A highly projectable middle-six forechecker, net-driver and finisher.—Luke Sweeney

37.       Sascha Boumedienne, D (6-2, 183 lbs)—Boston University (NCAA) Upside: 7.0  Certainty: 6.0

Sascha Boumedienne, the BU freshman with a booming shot, struggled to adjust to the college level but finished strong at the U18s, breaking the tournament record for points by a defenseman (14). He has the tools for the next level, but questions remain about whether there’s a role in the modern NHL that fits his game.—Anni Karvinen

38.       Henry Brzustewicz, C (6-1, 194 lbs)—London Knights (OHL) Upside: 7.0 Certainty: 6.0

Brzustewicz thrives in London’s structured yet offensively liberal system, showcasing strong puck-moving instincts, physical engagement, and offensive activation, though his stiff skating and pressure-handling limit his consistency. With size, effort, and offensive upside, he has NHL potential, but needs refinement in his defensive adaptability to fully realize it.—David Saad

39.       Kurban Limatov, D (6-4, 190 lbs)—Dynamo Moskova (MHL)        Upside: 7.0  Certainty: 6.0

Kurban Limatov’s skating is remarkably fluid for his frame, allowing him to lead transitions and activate off the blue line with surprising ease, though he’s more of a puck distributor than a true offensive threat at this stage.

While his decision-making improved throughout the season, Limatov still makes puzzling plays in his own zone. He takes inefficient routes on retrievals and fails to consistently leverage his size and skating to angle off opponents, often defaulting to stick checks instead. The Russian blueliner’s work ethic and raw tools indicate top-four potential, but reaching that ceiling will require sharper defensive habits and more consistent use of his physical advantages.—Kareem Ramadan

40.       Milton Gastrin, C (6-1, 185 lbs)—MoDo (J20)                                 Upside: 6.5 Certainty: 7.0

Milton Gastrin is a responsible center with exceptional speed who will go to the difficult areas of the ice to score. His brain and hands can struggle to keep up with his feet..—Ethan Lindley

41.       Sean Barnhill, C (6-5, 214 lbs)—Dubuque Fighting Saints (USHL)             Upside: 5.5  Certainty: 6.5

In a draft chock-full of 6-4+ D-men, Barnhill stands out from the pack for his strong skating and poise. Not a finished product, but the perfect ball of clay for the right development team.—Luke Sweeney

42.       Max Psenicka, C (6-5, 185 lbs)—Portland Winterhawks (WHL) Upside: 5.5  Certainty: 7.0

A towering right-shot defenseman, Max Psenicka is a fluid skater with exceptional defensive awareness and an active stick. Max played an important role in Portland’s run to the Western Conference Finals, but is offensively limited and he will need to refine his decision making to thrive at the next level.—Collin Wilcox

43.       Michal Svrcek, C (5-10, 176 lbs)—Brynas IF (SHL)                        Upside: 7.0  Certainty: 5.0

Michal Svrcek is a quick and shifty winger who flashes strong handling skills and the ability to create chances through sheer will. He lacks size but not tenacity and knows how to use his smaller frame to win puck battles against much heavier competition.—Ethan Lindley

44.       Arvid Drott, C (6-0, 187 lbs)—Djurgardens IF (J20)                                    Upside: 6.5  Certainty: 6.0

Combining strength and speed with a strong shot, Arvid Drott is molded like a typical power winger. He uses his physicality to drive the net and does a lot of his damage from right around the crease.—Ethan Lindley

45.       Daniil Prokhorov, C (6-6, 218 lbs)—Dynamo St. Petersburg (MHL) Upside: 6.0  Certainty: 6.0

Daniil Prokhorov is one of the draft’s most physically imposing prospects, combining a 6-5 frame with an aggressive, heat-seeking missile approach on the forecheck that few NHLers—let alone draft-eligible players—can match. Prokhorov’s physical dominance and straight-line tools give him a high floor as an energy forward, but continued development is necessary to raise his offensive ceiling.—Kareem Ramadan

46.       Filip Ekberg, W (5-10, 168 lbs)—Ottawa 67’2 (OHL)          Upside: 8.0 Certainty: 4.0

Filip Ekberg may have been a late riser, but his surge was no surprise: with the high hockey IQ, pace, and creativity, a bet on Ekberg was bound to pay off eventually. It did in spades as he finished the season strong with an 11-game point streak and MVP honors at the U18s. Though questions remain about his efficiency, defense, and size, his offensive instincts and motor suggest real middle-six NHL upside with proper development.—David Saad

47.       Ben Kevan, W (6-0, 185 lbs)—Des Moines Buccaneers (USHL) Upside: 7.0  Certainty: 6.0

Kevan’s an exhilarating player to watch. He’s constantly pushing the pace up ice, racking up shot attempts, and hitting wide-open teammates in stride, all while using his hands, creativity, and vision to the maximum extent, giving him one of the class’s best highlight reels. That said, he plays more of a perimeter game and struggles to gain the interior lane with consistency, calling into question his NHL projectability.—Luke Sweeney

48.       Jacob Rombach, D (6-6, 209 lbs)—Lincoln Stars (USHL)   Upside: 4.5 Certainty: 7.5

While his game isn’t the most thrilling, Rombach has certainly got NHL scouts excited. He uses his reach to play a polished defensive game that he will have time to add to throughout a college career with the Gophers.—Luke Sweeney

49.       Daniil Skvortsov, D (6-4, 214 lbs)—Guelph Storm (OHL)   Upside: 6.0 Certainty: 7.0

Danill Skvortsov is a disciplined, defensively mature 6-4 defenceman with strong rush defense, physicality, and smart positional play, thriving in a shutdown role despite limited offensive flash. While his puck play is simple, he supports the rush well and projects as a reliable penalty killer or 5v5 defensive anchor at the NHL level.—David Saad

50.       Gustav Hillstrom, C (6-2, 176 lbs)—Brynas IF (SHL)          Upside: 5.5  Certainty: 6.0

One of the top faceoff centers in this draft with a 60% win rate, Hillstrom is a projectable, defensively responsible bottom-six center. His offensive skills are a bit plain, but NHL potential exists beyond the production.—Austin Kelly

51.       Cameron Schmidt, W (5-7, 157 lbs)—Vancouver Giants (WHL) Upside: 8.5 Certainty: 4.5

Schmidt is almost certainly the most purely skilled player available in this range, a statement that would still be true almost anywhere in the first round. Despite his high-end skating, shooting and handling, Schmidt is small and struggles to play off teammates or drive the middle of the ice.—Luke Sweeney

52.       Eddie Genborg, W (6-2, 205 lbs)—Linkoping HC (SHL)     Upside: 5.5 Certainty: 6.5

A physical forward with a nasty edge, Genborg doesn’t just seek to take the puck away from his opponents: he intends to do it while inflicting as much pain as possible. He lives in front of the net and uses his strength and power to wreak havoc.—Ethan Lindley

53.       Theo Stockselius, W (6-3, 196 lbs)—Djurgardens IF (J20)   Upside: 5.5  Certainty: 6.0

Theo Stockselius demonstrates a combination of size and skill that’s very tough to handle on the cycle or in front of the net. He’s not the fleetest of foot right now, but he has a lot of room to fill out which will increase his power and potentially help give his skating another gear.—Ethan Lindley

54.       Semyon Frolov, G (6-3, 203 lbs)—Spartak Moskova (MHL) Upside: 8.0  Certainty: 4.5

A pro-style game and size, in addition to mature vision and reflexes, makes Frolov a highly projectable NHLer. Some scouts who’ve been able to get proper viewings of Frolov think he may be the best goaltender in this year’s draft.—Austin Kelly

55.       Haoxi Wang, D (6-6, 209 lbs)—Oshawa Generals (OHL)    Upside: 5.0 Certainty: 6.5

Wang is one of the rawest prospects in the draft, but his rare blend of size and skating makes him an intriguing long-term project. While his defensive game and decision-making need significant refinement, flashes of offensive awareness and strong tools offer upside if developed with patience and structure.—David Saad

56.       William Moore, C (6-2, 174 lbs)—USNTDP (USHL)                       Upside: 8.0 Certainty: 3.0

While a weaker year in the program didn’t help Will Moore’s case, he finished strong at the U18s, leading Team USA in scoring. With improved consistency and detail, the big and skilled center could make our ranking look foolish.—Anni Karvinen

57.       Jakob Ihs-Wozniak, C (6-2, 190 lbs)—Lulea HF (SHL)        Upside: 7.0  Certainty: 5.0

A skilled power-winger boasting a wicked release, Jakob Ihs-Wozniak combines his size and reach with a soft touch on the puck to be able to score in a variety of ways.—Ethan Lindley

58.       Max Westergard, W (5-11, 168 lbs)—Frolunda HC (J20)     Upside: 6.0  Certainty: 5.0

Only weeks shy of 2026 draft eligibility, Max Westergård impressed by earning SHL playoff minutes this spring. Slightly undersized, he still has the skill and work ethic to develop into a middle-six winger if everything clicks.—Anni Karvinen

59.       Ivan Ryabkin, C (5-11, 209 lbs)—Muskegon Lumberjacks (USHL) Upside: 8.0 Certainty: 4.0

Ryabkin’s a known quantity: the skill is there, the mentality is not.

Though its common for Russian prospects to have bogus ‘character issues’ attached to them, this is not the case here. Ryabkin used his shooting, handling and bulldog approach to score over a point-per-game, but was disengaged on both sides of the puck, refused to play within system, and was outright dirty.

He has top 5-10 skill, absolutely, but his approach will—and should—dissuade many NHL clubs.—Luke Sweeney

60.       Matthew Gard, C (6-4, 192 lbs)—Red Deer Rebels (WHL) Upside: 6.0 Certainty: 5.0

An intelligent centre who did a lot of heavy lifting on the third worst offence in the CHL. Both a physically engaged forechecker and a big forward with skill, Gard has plenty of upside.—Luke Sweeney

61.       Joshua Ravensbergen, G (6-5, 192 lbs)—Prince George Cougars (WHL) Upside: 7.0  Certainty: 4.5

Has the size and the technical skill-base to succeed at the NHL level, especially if he can round out his tracking and rebound control.—Luke Sweeney

62.       Dakoda Rhéaume-Mullen, D (6-0, 181 lbs)—University of Michigan (NCAA) Upside: 5.5 Certainty: 4.5

I’ve been banging the drum for Dakoda Rhéaume-Mullen all season. He may be a bit undersized for a shutdown role, but his excellent skating and positioning more than make up for it.—Anni Karvinen

63.       Bruno Osmanis, W (5-11, 170 lbs)—IF Bjorkloven (J20)     Upside: 6.0 Certainty: 5.5

Bruno Osmanis plays a strong 200-foot game and displays flashes of creative puck movement in open ice. He’s an effective forechecker who creates advantages with his hard work in the corners.—Ethan Lindley

64.       Tinus Luc Koblar, W (6-3, 187 lbs)—Leksands IF (J20)       Upside:  5.5 Certainty: 5.5

Tinus Luc Koblar’s package of tools is very enticing. The tall and lanky center combines sharp agility with very quick handles to exploit strong defenses. He also has moments of physicality that should only become more frequent and violent as he gets stronger.—Ethan Lindley

65.       Adam Benak, W (5-7, 163 lbs)—Youngstown Phantoms (USHL) Upside: 8.0 Certainty: 2.5

It wouldn’t be crazy to call Benak the draft’s most purely skilled player, or to say that he has among the most mature playstyles either. Unfortunately, his size and strength are big impediments.—Luke Sweeney

66.       Ryan Miller, W (5-11, 174 lbs)—Portland Winterhawks (WHL) Upside: 6.0 Certainty: 6.0

An industrious forward who skates and handles the puck very well, Miller’s shift-to-shift consistency demonstrated that he can be a dependable playoff performer.—Luke Sweeney

67.       Will Horcoff, W/C (6-4, 181 lbs)—University of Michigan (NCAA)            Upside: 6.5 Certainty: 5.5

A towering forward whose projection is much more enticing than the player he currently is. Has some creativity and handling ability in tight around the net and along the wall, but puck protection and finishing need to improve at his size.—Luke Sweeney

68.       Quinn Beauchesne, D (6-0, 187 lbs)—Guelph Storm (OHL)            Upside: 6.0 Certainty: 6.0

Beauchesne is an elite skater with aggressive, high-tempo play who excels at closing gaps, disrupting rushes, and setting the game’s pace. While he needs physical growth and could use some polish in his shift-to-shift execution, his mindset, mobility, and two-way upside make him a potential late steal with breakout potential.—David Saad

69.       Topias Hynninen, C (5-11, 176 lbs)—Jukurit (Liiga)                        Upside:  5.5 Certainty: 5.0

Topias Hynninen should’ve been drafted last year but flew under the radar in limited bottom-six minutes. Given a bigger role this season, he’s been versatile, productive, and relentless—please, someone draft him.—Anni Karvinen

70.       Luca Romano, C (5-11, 176 lbs)—Kitchener Rangers (OHL) Upside: 7.0 Certainty: 5.5

Luca Romano is a skilled, creative center with high hockey IQ and strong playmaking instincts, but his undersized frame and limited pace raise concerns at higher levels. Regardless, his finesse-driven game is fun to watch, making him a long-term project worth rooting for, that may yet bear some upside as a top-9 center.—David Saad

71.       Tommy Lafreniere, C (5-11, 170 lbs)—Kamloops Blazer (WHL) Upside:  6.0 Certainty: 6.5

The ceiling is low, but the certainty is high; Lafreniere plays an intelligent, disciplined, responsible game, allowing him to pester carriers and win battles all over the ice.—Luke Sweeney

72.       Alexei Medvedev, G (6-3, 181 lbs)—London Knights (OHL)          Upside: 7.0 Certainty: 4.0

Medvedev is a calm, methodical goalie who relies on strong positioning and composure rather than reflexes. Though prone to dropping into the butterfly too quickly, effective puck tracking, size and confidence make him a promising prospect that serves as a bit of a contrast to the rest of the goaltending class.—David Saad

73.       Owen Martin, C (6-0, 183 lbs)—Spokane Chiefs (WHL)     Upside: 6.0 Certainty: 7.0

Martin has been a favorite of scouts due to his well-rounded game and high effort level. A skilled offensive play driver who makes up for an average frame and lack of raw strength with good defensive IQ.—Luke Sweeney

74.       Harry Nansi, W/C (6-3, 179 lbs)—Oshawa Generals OHL) Upside: 7.5 Certainty: 4.5

Nansi is a big, hardworking winger, excelling in board battles and creating scoring chances from the slot with his hands and playmaking in transition. Despite struggles with skating, inconsistency, and poor decision-making under pressure, his size, effort, and vision offer potential for a bottom-six NHL role with proper development.—David Saad

75.       Ashton Schultz, W (5-11, 181 lbs)—Chicago Steel (USHL)             Upside: 6.5  Certainty: 4.5

A skilled, smart and opportunistic player, Schultz will need to continue to develop his defensive game and limit his perimeter play.—Luke Sweeney

76.       Pyotr Andreyanov, G (6-2, 207 lbs)—Krasnaya Armiya Moskova (MHL) Upside: 7.5 Certainty: 4.0

Arguably the top Russian goalie, Andreyanov dictates play with his coveted combination of size, athleticism and vision.—Luke Sweeney

77.       Anthony Allain-Samake, D (6-0, 165 lbs)—Sioux City Muskateers (USHL) Upside: 6.5 Certainty: 5.5

Though not the biggest, Allain-Samake has strong skating and handling tools. Among the draft’s youngest, seeming to improve every game, and possessing a confident, attack mentality, Allain-Samake seems primed for a leap.—Luke Sweeney

78.       Jimmy Lombardi, C (6-0, 179 lbs)—Flint Firebirds (OHL)  Upside: 6.0 Certainty: 6.5

Lombardi is a pesty high-energy forward who uses speed and tenacity to pressure opponents, with a solid defensive game as a supporting center. However, his overzealousness leads to errors, and he may be better suited as a winger. With refinement, he projects as a bottom-six energy forward.—David Saad

79.       Etha Czata, C (6-1, 174 lbs)—Niagara Ice Dogs (OHL)       Upside: 6.0  Certainty: 6.5

Ethan Czata is a competent two way center who got off to a hot start in Niagara before tailing off in the second half along with the rest of the team. Czata isn’t a remarkably skilled handler or burner on his skates, but what he is is a reliable forward who exhibits good details in all three phases. There is a good foundation to work from here, and if he can produce something closer to his first half last season than there may be some untapped upside left.—Kareem Ramadan

80.       Charlie Trethewey, D (6-2, 201 lbs)—USNTDP (USHL)     Upside: 6.0 Certainty: 5.5

One of the more impactful defenders on a NTDP team that struggled to hit its stride for most of the year. Trethewey is a solid two-way RHD who could find a role as a bottom-pair NHL defenseman.—Anni Karvinen

81.       Malte Vass, D (6-2, 194 lbs)—IF Farjestad BK (J20)                        Upside:  5.0 Certainty: 5.0

Malte Vass is a big, mobile defenseman that flashes the ability to start rushes with his feet. A nasty defender, Vass loves to take his opponents hard into the wall whenever he has the opportunity too, almost to a fault.—Ethan Lindley

82.       David Lewandowski, W (6-1, 176 lbs)—Saskatoon Blades (WHL) Upside: 6.5 Certainty: 6.0

A smart, solid, all-around forward with a strong shot and sub-par skating, though has a straightforward path to the NHL.—Luke Sweeney

83.       Kristian Epperson, W (6-0, 185 lbs)—Saginaw Spirit (OHL) Upside: 7.0 Certainty: 5.5

Epperson rebounded in Saginaw after a tough year with the NTDP, reminding us of his strong forechecking, high energy, and transition skills. Though his poor stick discipline and underdeveloped offensive game are troubling, his pace and competitiveness make him a valuable, pesty third-line winger.—David Saad

84.       Viggo Nordlund, W (5-9, 168 lbs)—Skelleftea AIK (SHL)    Upside: 6.0  Certainty: 5.0

Combining exceptional skating and dynamic hands, Viggo Nordlund is a handful in transition with room to make plays, but his size limits his effectiveness in other areas.—Ethan Lindley

85.       Shamar Moses, W (6-1, 203 lbs)—North Bay Battalion OHL) Upside: 7.0 Certainty: 4.5

Still a super toolsy checking winger—counting creative handling, strong playmaking vision, and an NHL-level shot among his skills—Moses has fallen in our rankings as his offensive success and middle-lane-driving have tailed off.—Luke Sweeney

86.       Reese Hamilton, D (6-1, 170 lbs)—Regina Pats (WHL)       Upside: 7.5 Certainty: 4.5

A poised, smooth-skating, two-way defender who has experienced likely the sharpest fall-from-grace between our preliminary and final rankings.—Luke Sweeney

87.       Jamiro Reber, W (5-10, 176 lbs)—HV71 (SHL)                  Upside: 6.0  Certainty: 5.0

Jamiro Reber boasts dynamic puck skills, strong vision, and an intense motor but struggles with being pushed to the outside by stronger defenders.—Ethan Lindley

88.       Tomas Pobezal, W (5-10, 179 lbs)—HK Nitra (Slovakia)     Upside: 6.0  Certainty: 5.5

Despite lacking NHL size and a projectable offensive game, Pobezal pushed play in Czech pro hockey with his vision, IQ, and intensity, while also being notable for his leadership qualities.—Luke Sweeney

89.       Alex Huang, D (6-0, 161 lbs)—Chicoutimi Saugeneens (QMJHL) Upside: 7.5 Certainty: 5.5

Slight in size and without a standout skill, Huang is still an effective puck mover and defender.—Luke Sweeney

90.       Nathan Behm, W (6-2, 198 lbs)—Kamloops Blazers (WHL)           Upside: 7.5 Certainty: 4.0

A 6-2 puckhandling sniper with flashes of playmaking vision, he possesses a cherry-picking, perimeter approach that isn’t well-loved.—Luke Sweeney

91.       Conrad Fondrk, C (6-0, 192 lbs)—USNTDP (USHL)           Upside: 6.0 Certainty: 5.0

Handling skill and playmaking vision, Fondrk needs to develop his consistency as well as his interior and off-puck games to elevate his skillset.—Luke Sweeney

92.       LJ Mooney, W (5-7, 157 lbs)—USNTDP (USHL)                Upside: 7.5 Certainty: 3.5

A skilled forward with high-end vision, intensity and speed, though he needs to find the middle and leverage his shot more often to find success at higher levels.—Luke Sweeney

93.       Viktor Klingsell, W (5-10, 187 lbs)—Skelleftea AIK (J20)   Upside: 6.5  Certainty: 5.0

Viktor Klingsell is a gifted playmaker and has the vision to spot open teammates, executing difficult passes through layers of coverage, but he does too much of his work from the perimeter.—Ethan Lindley

94.       Everett Baldwin, D (6-0, 174 lbs)—USNTDP (USHL)         Upside: 6.5  Certainty: 5.5

A puck-mover of average size, Baldwin efficiently extends or kills plays in all three zones and possessing upside as a transition player.—Luke Sweeney

95.       Andrew O’Neill, C (6-2, 194 lbs)—USNTDP (USHL)                     Upside:  Certainty:

Andrew O’Neill lacks elite raw tools, but he earns his place through relentless compete level, IQ and impeccable attention to detail. History shows a few unheralded players defy expectations each draft—don’t be surprised if O’Neill wills himself into that group this draft.—Kareem Ramadan

96.       Kieren Dervin, C (6-1, 183 lbs)—Kingston Frontenacs (OHL) Upside:  Certainty:

Dervin is a late-rising, skilled forward who showed real bottom-six potential in his limited OHL experience. Known for his slick puck handling and strong two-way play, he combines defensive awareness with offensive creativity. Though the sample size is small, his flashes of talent make him an intriguing prospect worth watching.—David Saad

HM. Cooper Simpson, W (6-1, 179 lbs)—Tri-City Storm (USHL)   Upside: 8.0  Certainty: 3.0

A High School forward, brimming with potential, but has fallen into Junior habits and will need to become a less one-dimensional shooter to reach it.—Luke Sweeney